ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Farm groups informed about wildlife amendment

I was saddened to read a recent letter that claimed farm and ranch groups oppose the Clean Water, Wildlife and Parks Amendment because they are misinformed. On the contrary, they actively oppose it because they see with crystal clarity what will ...

I was saddened to read a recent letter that claimed farm and ranch groups oppose the Clean Water, Wildlife and Parks Amendment because they are misinformed. On the contrary, they actively oppose it because they see with crystal clarity what will happen if this measure becomes part of our state's constitution.

As a longtime farmer, I'm a big believer in protecting our state's great outdoors and natural resources. North Dakota's farmers and ranchers were our state's first conservationists going back to statehood. But the proposed amendment wildly misses the mark in trying to accomplish that.

Under the amendment, 5 percent of North Dakota's oil extraction tax would be set aside in a new conservation fund. The amendment requires between 75 and 90 percent of this fund be spent each year.

The only conservation spending specifically outlined in the measure is that these massive funds -- anywhere from $300 million to $400 million a biennium based on current oil production projections -- could be used to acquire farmland.

If the nonprofit groups supporting it are given millions of dollars every year that they can use to acquire land, it won't be long before we will see them acquiring and removing land from production agriculture, driving up land prices and making it harder for agriculture to compete, especially new farmers and ranchers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The measure is also troubling because the groups supporting this amendment have a history of being hostile toward the ag industry, which is still our state's largest industry. Imagine the impact to our state's economy and workforce if these groups suddenly have hundreds of millions of dollars to spend to undermine the agriculture industry in the name of conservation.

Let's be clear, folks, the out-of-state groups financially behind this measure would like to change our way of life here in North Dakota, and they see the creation of this private fund in our state constitution as their way to do just that.

That is why we are against this measure -- because we are fully informed. The truths behind this amendment are loud and clear, and that's why farm and ranch groups have come together in the North Dakotans for Common Sense Conservation coalition to oppose it.

Editor's note: Watne, is president of the North Dakota Farmers Union.

Related Topics: WILDLIFE
What To Read Next
Mikkel Pates set the standard for agricultural journalism during his 44-year career in the region, working for Agweek, The Forum and the Worthington Globe.
Mikkel Pates reflects on his time as an ag journalist in a three-part series.