SUBSCRIBE NOW 3 months just 99¢/month

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

California court delays enforcement of part of pig welfare law

Judge James Arguelles of California Superior Court in Sacramento County ruled on Monday, however, that grocers, restaurants and retailers would not be subject to enforcement of the new restrictions on whole pork meat sales until six months after the state enacts final regulations.

Pink feeder pigs are in a barn with slatted floors.
Opponents of California's Proposition 12 in the U.S. meat industry have argued that enforcement would hurt producers and consumers, and violate the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause by requiring out-of-state producers to comply or face the sales ban.
Erin Ehnle Brown / Grand Vale Creative LLC
We are part of The Trust Project.

CHICAGO — A California court said it will delay enforcement of part of a law aimed at ensuring more humane treatment of farm animals, which opponents warned could lead to pork shortages and higher food prices in the most populous U.S. state. Supporters of Proposition 12, approved by California voters in November 2018, say it will make food production more humane by setting minimum space requirements for breeding pigs, egg-laying hens and calves raised for veal.

The law, which took effect on Jan. 1, also forbids the sale of pork, eggs or raw veal from animals enclosed in too little space. Breeding sows are often kept in crates that do not allow them to turn around or stand up.

Judge James Arguelles of California Superior Court in Sacramento County ruled on Monday, however, that grocers, restaurants and retailers would not be subject to enforcement of the new restrictions on whole pork meat sales until six months after the state enacts final regulations.

The California Grocers Association applauded the ruling on Tuesday. Along with other business groups, the association had sued the state seeking to delay enforcement until 28 months after regulations are finalized.

"The state has not been able to provide necessary guidance for compliance," said Ron Fong, association president.

ADVERTISEMENT

The California Department of Food and Agriculture said on Tuesday it and the attorney general's office are evaluating the ruling. Pork producers and suppliers remain subject to enforcement if they violate square-footage requirements that went into effect on Jan. 1, the department said.

"It's a little bit of a hollow victory for the grocers because they get their product from suppliers and those suppliers have to comply with Prop 12," said Wayne Pacelle, president of the animal-welfare group Animal Wellness Action.

Opponents of Proposition 12 in the U.S. meat industry have argued that enforcement would hurt producers and consumers, and violate the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause by requiring out-of-state producers to comply or face the sales ban.

California represents about 15% of the U.S. pork market, and about 87% of pork sold in California comes from pigs raised outside the state, industry officials said.

Last month, Seaboard Foods, the nation's second-biggest pig producer, said it would limit sales of whole pork products in California because of Proposition 12.

(Reporting by Tom Polansek; Editing by Sandra Maler)

What to read next
The 2021 drought was most intense in northern Minnesota but producers in all but four Minnesota counties will be eligible for state aid.
The decision means carbon pipeline companies must file for a siting permit with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. Without statewide authority, permitting would have been left up to individual counties along the pipeline route.
Addressing the United Nations Security Council, Blinken appealed to Russia to stop blockading Ukrainian ports.
Monday, May 23, deadline looms for drought relief, supplemental agriculture budget.