Column: Activists harming own cause

We all want cheap energy. We also want safe and responsible energy development. Unfortunately, the extreme politics of environmental activists, and just plain old not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) parochialism, often stand in the way.We have two recent ...


We all want cheap energy. We also want safe and responsible energy development.

Unfortunately, the extreme politics of environmental activists, and just plain old not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) parochialism, often stand in the way.
We have two recent examples from North Dakota.
First, let’s go to Rugby. The folks at the University of North Dakota’s Energy and Environmental Research Center have been trying to organize a deep borehole drilling project near that community, but they’ve run into a tidal wave of NIMBY.
When the Pierce County Commission put the project on their agenda, the public’s reaction was overwhelmingly hostile.
Why all the opposition to drilling a really, really deep hole? One goal of researchers is to better understand how radioactive waste from sources such as nuclear power plants can be safely disposed of.
But that term, “radioactive waste,” set a lot of people off, which is too bad because the furious opposition was misguided.
“To be clear, there is no radioactive material involved in this project,” UND President Ed Schafer wrote in an editorial backing the research.
Not only was there no waste involved in the EERC’s project, but none of that waste could be disposed of in North Dakota without significant amendment to state law.
What the NIMBY crowd in Pierce County was really opposing wasn’t radioactive waste so much as the gathering of knowledge. Knowledge that could be invaluable to the future of where we get our energy. Cheap, clean nuclear power could be a cornerstone of America’s energy portfolio in the future, but not until we solve the waste problem.
But we can’t solve that problem while researchers are in the thrall of myopic and ignorant public paranoia.
Now, let’s head out to McKenzie County in the Oil Patch, where IHD Solids Management hopes to become the first waste facility in the state to accept mildly radioactive byproducts from oil drilling.
And I do mean mild. A manager of the facility said “the level of radioactivity of the waste would be slightly above the radiation a granite countertop gives off and below the radioactivity level of phosphorus fertilizer,” Amy Dalrymple reported for Forum News Service.
This is a positive development. In years past, there have been problems related to the illegal dumping of these materials.
What contributed to the illegal dumping problem was North Dakota’s absurdly low threshold for radioactivity in waste disposed of in-state. After a lengthy process of review and public hearings, the Department of Health raised the threshold.
This means the oil industry might have better access to appropriate disposal facilities in the future.
I say “might” because certain extreme environmental groups are working on a legal challenge to the new rules.
And they’re trying to inflame public sentiment against the facilities with that scary “radioactive” term.
“People are really concerned if these landfills are going to go radioactive near them,” Don Morrison, executive director of the Dakota Resource Council, told Dalrymple.
Morrison said his group has requested an attorney general’s opinion regarding the process used to develop the rule, and might consider further action after that.
But you really have to wonder why they’re fighting this. Don’t we want responsible disposal of this waste?
I suspect what Morrison and his ilk really want is to stop oil development entirely, and see this issue as a handy roadblock they can throw in the way.
They’re trying to make the public fearful of progress in an industry they hate. But we can’t let NIMBY hysteria and aggressive political agendas stand in the way of progress.
Editor’s note: Port is the founder of, a North Dakota political blog.

What To Read Next
As Mikkel Pates approaches his retirement from Agweek after 44 years in journalism, he talks to Rose Dunn about learning TV, covering ag's characters and scandals and looking toward the future.
Members Only
“In our industry there aren’t a lot of young people in it. I like the fact that there are a lot of young people in agriculture here,” he said of the Mitchell area.
Minnesota Farmers Union, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association and Minnesota Corn Growers Association were pleased with items in Gov. Tim Walz's "One Minnesota Budget" proposal.
John Deere and the American Farm Bureau Federation recently announced they had come to an agreement that will lead to more accessible repairs to John Deere equipment.