Drought reignites irrigation from the Missouri River Garrison Diversion Project's McClusky Canal

Farmer Paul R. Anderson of Coleharbor, North Dakota, is jumping back into his “.007 Project,” — irrigating from the Garrison Diversion Project’s McClusky Canal. Anderson is convinced that an investment into a variable-rate system is wise considering a multi-year drought trend and will help his family in future generations.

COLEHARBOR, North Dakota — Paul Anderson has dubbed his new irrigation project "Double-0 Seven" -- buts it's not because it’s a secret.

In fact, he’d like more people to know that the new irrigation is from the the famed Garrison Diversion Conservancy District.

Why Double-O Seven?

It’s literally .007 miles from the headgates of the McClusky canal. “About 35 feet,” farmer Anderson said, smiling as he gave a recent tour of his construction effort.


Paul R. Anderson, of Coleharbor, North Dakota, said the droughty conditions since 2018 have convinced him to get back into irrigating -- this time from the McClusky Canal, and with an upgraded, variable-rate system. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

Since 2018, Anderson has seen weather trending drier. In 2021, he committed to constructing a project that will be operational in 2022.

“We will wet-test everything this fall yet,” he said.

Four headgates (right) near Coleharbor, North Dakota, together could deliver 1,950 cubic feet per second of Lake Audubon water into the McClusky Canal, but currently only one of the four is used at a time. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

North Dakota’s dam

A bit of background: Lake Audubon is a “major sub-impoundment” of Lake Sakakawea, the reservoir created by the Garrison Dam on the Missouri River, completed in 1953.


Black circles indicate the 7.200 acres irrigation pivots, east of Coleharbor, North Dakota, currently operating from the McClusky Canal, a 73.6-mile piece of the ambitious Garrison Diversion project. That’s just a third of what could be irrigated. Photo supplied by the Garrison Conservancy District. 2020 photo. Garrison Conservancy District / Agweek

The dam initially was for flood control and navigation in central states. Farm irrigation was supposed to be part of the compensation to North Dakota for flooding fertile lowlands.

The McClusky Canal is 73.6 miles long and was built from 1969 to 1976. It was designed to take water from Lake Audubon to the Lonetree Reservoir (later deauthorized and made into a wildlife management area, managed by the state).

Lake Audubon (blue, upper left) feeds into black line, the McClusky Canal, near Coalharbor, North Dakota. The green color denotes irrigable soils, while the black circles show the existing projects, accounting for 7,200 acres of 23,700 acres of authority. Map supplied by the Garrison Conservancy District. 2021. Garrison Conservancy District / Agweek

The state Garrison Conservancy District manages the canal — 15 feet deep, 25 feet wide at the bottom, about 84 feet wide on the surface. The district manages it in a “cooperative agreement” for the federal Bureau of Reclamation, an agency within the federal Department of the Interior.

There were lofty aspirations for the McClusky Canal.

It was built to carry 1,950 cubic feet of water per second, but only delivers a fourth of that today, based on demand. It was built to irrigate up to 250,000 acres of farmland, plus provide water for municipal and rural water systems.

The canal is authorized to irrigate only 23,700 acres. And only 7,200 acres is allocated. In the middle of the drought, the Anderson project is the only one currently in the works, adding 610 acres over the next two years.


Sweet and sour

Paul, 54, and his wife, Joleen, live with their son, Augustus, 7, on the farm at Coleharbor, just south of Lake Audubon in central North Dakota. Paul’s parents, Richard “Rick” Anderson and mother, Charlotte, live at the farm shop site one mile south of the headgates.

The Andersons operate an average-sized farm for the area, raising wheat, corn and soybeans, as well as sometimes confection sunflowers, lentils and dry edible beans.

Rick, now 80, grew up in the Pembina/Neche area in northeast North Dakota, in the northern Red River Valley. He graduated from North Dakota State University in 1966, with a degree in agricultural economics.

At age 26, Rick held a 150-acre beet sugar allocation from American Crystal Sugar Co. (prior to it becoming a farmer-owned cooperative in 1974). Rick had an opportunity to rent another 125 acres to raise beets, but the corporate Crystal managers balked. “They weren’t going to let a kid be that big a beet farmer,” Paul said.

Rick and Charlotte Anderson moved to her home area near Coleharbor, North Dakota, in 1968. They added onto the house in 1973, a mile south of the McClusky Canal headgates. Their son, Paul, is starting an irrigation project that in the next two years will use canal water on 610 acres. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

So in 1968, Rick and Charlotte packed to moved west to the area where her parents had homesteaded in 1906. Farmland prices were cheaper. Wheat yields were roughly the same at the time.

Ebbs and flows

As the McClusky Canal was being dug, wheat prices soared in the wake of the huge Russian grain purchase in 1973. The grain economy overheated and led to the farm credit crisis in the 1980s . Land values declined, loan interest rates soared and prices collapsed.

Then came the 1988 and 1989 drought.

Paul R. Anderson this fall plans to “wet-test” this parcel, just north of the McClusky Canal. In the 1990s, Andersonhad irrigated alfalfa hay, directly from nearby Lake Audubon, and idled his rig in 2014, but is restarting in 2022, as dry conditions persist. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

With crops in surplus, farmers couldn’t use water from federal sources (a refuge lake or canal) to produce federally-subsidized “program crops” — like wheat, corn and soybeans.

In the midst of all of this, Paul graduated high school in 1984. He went on to North Dakota State University where he got his bachelor’s degree in mechanized agriculture in 1989. He went on to get master’s in agricultural economics in 1992. As the drought abated, he considered going for a doctorate, but came home to farm.

Richard “Rick” Anderson, 80, has been on the Garrison Conservancy District board of directors since 1986, but doesn't vote in issues his son, Paul’s efforts to irrigate land in the “.007 Project” about 35 feet from the gate head to the McClusky Canal. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

In 1986, Rick was elected to represent his county on the Garrison Diversion Board, which governs the district. (Rick is still on the board but recuses himself from Paul’s irrigation issues and never applied for his own irrigation permit.)

Making hay

In 1991, young Paul went goose hunting with a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service manager in charge of the Audubon National Wildlife Refuge. The manager agreed that he could pull irrigation water directly from Lake Audubon for crops and put some of the water in the refuge as habitat for nesting waterfowl. From 1991 to 1993, he put in three pivots for 500 acres.

Under the rules of the time, Paul could only use the water for non-program crops — like alfalfa hay.

“We were doing long hours in the hay, dealing with a lot of hay customers, being on-call to load hay out at odd hours,” he said.

But it was challenging.

Rick Anderson (right) moved to where his wife grew up in the Coleharbor, North Dakota, area in 1966. Son, Paul, 54, irrigated from Lake Audubon from 1991 to 2014 and today is investing a system that will take water from the McClusky Canal. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

In 1992, the Andersons got their first cutting of alfalfa hay on the ground, and then it started raining.

“And it pretty much rained every year,” Paul recalled. “Good, green, quality hay that you got up with no rain on it? That hay ran out of the shed with people throwing money at you. But once it got rained on, nobody wanted the rained-on hay at a price we could recover our costs out of.”

And if a year came where hay production wasn’t plentiful or was expensive?

The federal government responded by opening access to the Conservation Reserve Program, a land idling program.

“That really knocked the stuffing out of the bottom end of the hay market,” Paul said.

By 1996, the Andersons were done with hay. They sold their hay equipment and went back to conventional non-irrigated cropping. That year, Congress passed the “Freedom to Farm” bill, which changed the rules, allowing water from the canal to apply to program crops.

In 2014, the USFWS changed its policies to tighten up commercial activities throughout the country. Paul could no longer pull water from the lake. He parked his irrigation rig — temporarily.

Back to the future

Some 15 years ago, the Garrison Conservancy started encouraging canal-side irrigation.

Agweek in September 2013 wrote about the Knorr family from the Sawyer area who initiated the so-called “7.2 Project,” named for the number of miles from the headgate. The Knorrs have grown potatoes on some of their land and control a number of circles.

The McClusky Canal near Coleharbor, North Dakota, was intended to irrigate 250,000 acres, but was downsized to 23,700 acres. Of that, only 7,200 acres is currently allocated. This irrigated corn is about 4 miles from the canal, off an irrigation project 7.2 miles from the headgates. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

Rick’s land largely is too rocky for irrigated potatoes.

“When my dad came out here in 1968, some of this ground was pasture that you could walk across without touching the dirt because there were so many rocks on it,” Paul jokes.

Floating pumps in the McClusky Canal near Coleharbor, North Dakota, supply water to fields that produce corn, soybeans and potatoes where the soil type fits. Photo supplied by the Garrison Conservancy District. 2020 photo. Garrison Conservancy District / Agweek

In the current drought trend, Paul decided to get back into irrigation for other crops. But the cost has gone up.

"In the 1990s, a new pivot system cost about $30,000,” Paul recalled. “Today, a brand new pivot is over $100,000 to quarter-section center pivot.”

Paul is paying $30,000 for a “new to us” pivot. The late-1980s model has been updated with new gear boxes and new electronics.

“The pipe is sound, the nozzles are good,” he said “We’ll get it running.”

Irrigation equipment is placed into the McClusky Canal, drawing life-giving water to 7,200 acres of crops in the Coleharbor, North Dakota area. Photo supplied by the Garrison Conservancy District. 2020 photo. Garrison Conservancy District / Agweek

All told, the new irrigation will cost $70,000, for electrical and pipe under the ground.

“Putting in the pipe, getting the pumps refurbished, and some electrical, it’s considerably expensive to do it,” he said.

The North Dakota State Water Commission and the Garrison Diversion District have a 50-50 cost-share program growers can use to help out with the cost of pipe, pumps and electronics to get the water to the edge of their property. Paul repurposed some 12-inch diameter aluminum pipe they had a few years ago and he refurbished pumps.

Variable rates

Paul Anderson is adding variable-rate irrigation project, from the McClusky Canal near Coleharbor, North Dakota. He plans to “wet-test” the first part of project this fall. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

Paul will add a variable-rate irrigation system, which is relatively new. He’ll be able to shut off zones in the field where he doesn’t want to add water.

The USDA’s National Resources Conservation Service is funding a grant to help out with that project. The NRCS offers some grants to help producers convert from less-efficient flood irrigation to center-pivot irrigation.

“For our situation, we’re accessing the variable-rate irrigation project to help not put water in areas where pivots would be getting stuck and getting muddy,” Paul said. “Part of it is to have a variable frequency drive so we can control the speed of the pump. When we get to an area where we don’t need to put on so much water, it slows the pump down so our flow rate matches what actually needs to be coming out of the nozzles.”

Paul’s center-pivot has 11 towers which will be divided into 22 zones — cutting each tower in half.

Without irrigation, Paul’s produces 60 to 70 bushel per acre corn. With irrigation, yields are 150- to 180 bushels. His heavier soils produce 120 non-irrigated and should hit 180 to 200 bushels per acre with irrigation.

Paul R. Anderson’s is investing about $70,000 in irrigation that over two years will water about 610 acres from the McClusky Canal near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Corn yields should go from 60 to 70 bushel and to 150- to 180 bushels, under irrigation. Photo taken Sept. 1, 2021, near Coleharbor, North Dakota. Mikkel Pates / Agweek

Paul said irrigation will help take the variability of production. In effect, the current drought is prompting an investment he hopes will serve his family up to 40 years.

“I want to make this as durable and carefree for my son to be able to irrigate someday,” Paul said. “Hopefully he can take over the farm someday.”

Mikkel Pates is an agricultural journalist, creating print, online and television stories for Agweek magazine and Agweek TV.
What To Read Next
More people are turning to small, local egg producers as a sharp rise in conventionally farmed egg prices impacts the U.S. this winter.
This week on AgweekTV, we hear from Sen. John Hoeven on the farm bill. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz puts ag in his budget. We reminisce with Mikkel Pates, and we learn about the origins of the skid-steer.
There's something about Red Angus that caught the eye of this Hitterdal, Minnesota, beef producer.
David Karki of SDSU underlined that planting cover crops like rye is not so much about big yield increases, but it will make the land more tolerant of fluctuations in weather.