Today’s ag slanted toward cropsThe reality of today’s agriculture is that it is heavily slanted toward crop production if the land has the potential to be converted to crops. Like it or not, for beef production to expand, the economics of the beef cow need to have a threefold increase in net returns to compete with crop production.
By: Kris Ringwall, Agweek
The reality of today’s agriculture is that it is heavily slanted toward crop production if the land has the potential to be converted to crops. Like it or not, for beef production to expand, the economics of the beef cow need to have a threefold increase in net returns to compete with crop production.
To leave land in hay production, the net return for hay needs to double. These are very unlikable thoughts, that will drive the next wave of young agriculturists.
Livestock production always has been a part of farming because there always was something the family did not want to eat, so there came the need to have cows, horses, chickens, pigs and all the rest of the livestock fold. Obviously, the conversion of some crops and produce to meat allowed a more complete package for survival and certainly a better balance at the local level of production.
For example, milk that would not keep could be fed to the pigs. The pigs had a longer window of harvest, thus the balance. Keep in mind even the household pet was there to help clean up a hardy meal in exchange for some warmth and a day’s helping on the farm or ridding the place of unwanted guests.
In today’s world, one needs to look at the bigger picture and ask the same questions. Not one particular producer has the capacity to produce all that is needed. But thanks to modern transportation, those same pieces that were so needed on the homestead can now be parceled out around the neighborhood.
Therefore, larger operations have fine-tuned the production science behind the intended foods that need to be marketed, so production efforts have become focused.
Within these larger operations, there generally rests a foundational family structure that has good wisdom through a connection to those who actually lived through this needed balance from the past by the needed sharing of resources and need to be efficient so nothing is wasted.
In fact, Ralph Waldo Emerson said it best: “He (the farmer) stands close to nature; he obtains from the earth the bread and the meat. The food which was not, he causes to be.” That connection to the earth, soil, bread and meat, is as real today as it was when Emerson wrote his quote.
Some would quickly say there is no dilemma. But by merely asking the question, we start the process of acknowledging that something is awry. The modern, refined approach, at least in the more affluent countries, to the new generation is one of convenience and calculated efficiencies that purchase, measure, sort and process needed inputs into appropriately salable products, including food.
If the assumption that all the purchased inputs always will be available for the growing population models is true, I guess one does not need to be too concerned, so maybe the mud boots, coveralls and other working paraphernalia can be put to rest. But what if the assumption is not true and all the needed inputs will not be available forever?
Then the new ways break down and one needs to again back up and look for the source of those needed inputs. In the short term, money still seems to be the fix. By increasing one’s willingness to pay, those last few remaining inputs can be wrestled away and consumed.
As was noted, we return to our roots and the generations who understood the need for balance in the agricultural system and ask what made those early farms work. Well, there really is no secret. Great-grandma and great-grandpa did not have names for all the ingredients, but they understood the need to diversify and have balance in the soil, so as Emerson so noted of the farmer: “The food which was not, he causes to be.”
Today, we know more because we have those names and we better understand the soil is a very large, unfocused mass of living things. Each living thing is doing its part to make sure the pot never goes empty. That seems strange, but in science class, we called that the carbon cycle. Living animals are part of the loop that makes sure the cycle of life does not end.
Editor’s note: Ringwall is a North Dakota State University Extension Service livestock specialist and the Dickinson Research Extension Center director.