Caterpillar threatens Brazilian breadbasketBrazilian farmers are battling a voracious caterpillar that likely arrived from Asia, challenging the agricultural superpower’s widely touted mastery of tropical farming, just as it is on the verge of becoming the world’s top soybean producer.
By: Caroline Stauffer, Reuters
Brazilian farmers are battling a voracious caterpillar that likely arrived from Asia, challenging the agricultural superpower’s widely touted mastery of tropical farming, just as it is on the verge of becoming the world’s top soybean producer.
The caterpillar, a variety known as helicoverpa armigera that thrives in dry heat, was spotted for the first time in the Americas on cotton farms in drought-prone western Bahia in early 2012, fuelling panic among farmers who had no idea what it was.
The caterpillar was soon in soybean fields thousands of kilometers away, thanks to the long-distance flying power of its moths, consuming everything from tomatoes to sorghum.
While crop losses have thus far been limited, Brazil is now on red alert over the nation’s third major pest outbreak in 30 years. Officials have stepped up port controls, farmers are rethinking planting patterns and the hardest hit are blaming the government’s cumbersome bureaucracy for not allowing the import of pesticides that have helped control the bug in other nations.
Most important, the caterpillar appears to be eating away at Brazil’s proud claim to have conquered the craft of growing reliable crops in a tropical region where pests and disease can spread more quickly than for other major growers.
“When you find helicoverpa armigera you have to act immediately, while they are still small,” says Rudelvi Bombarda, who farms 2,000 hectares (4,942 acres) with his brother in São Desidério, a dusty farming hub in western Bahia.
Bombarda found his first helicoverpa armigera in a bean plant. He knew by the way the fattened, worm-like creature had chewed its way inside the pod, beyond the reach of chemicals, that it was not one of Brazil’s usual leaf-eating pests.
“If you wait and send it to a lab it will be too late,” he says.
Bahia, one of Brazil’s newest farming frontiers, lost 3 million tons of soy and cotton, nearly half of its usual grains production, between the caterpillar and the drought last year, according to the National Confederation of Agriculture. Still, Brazil produced an 81.5 million ton soybean crop.
To be sure, the caterpillar has not reduced forecasts for an even larger soybean harvest that could dethrone the United States as the world’s leading grower this year.
But it has provided a wake-up call on the risks of farming in the bug-ridden tropics, especially as more farmland is put into use. It also shows how Brazil’s emergence as a major breadbasket has made it the fastest-growing market for biotechnology firms like Monsanto, which could benefit from the outbreak by selling its new caterpillar-resistant genetically modified soy and cotton seeds.
‘It changed everything’
The government’s agricultural research agency Embrapa determined helicoverpa armigera was a new species in Brazil last February, a year after farmers in Bahia had noticed it was different from other pests and seemed immune to pesticides.
“No one was expecting a species like this,” says Alexandre Specht, the researcher whose microscope identified the caterpillar at a laboratory outside Brasilia.
A small display case at the Embrapa Cerrados research center compares brown helicoverpa armigera moths with the nearly identical helicoverpa zea, already known in South America.
The government is still studying how helicoverpa armigera arrived in Brazil. In the absence of a conclusive explanation, rumors of a bioterrorist attack occasionally surface.
Most likely, the caterpillar arrived with cargo on a plane or ship from Asia, says Luis Rangel, director of the sanitation department at Brazil’s agriculture ministry.
“With the intensification of this transit of goods, it is natural that sooner or later one of these pests would show up,” he says. “The Chinese bring in a lot of plants, it could have come in through this transit.”
China is Brazil’s No. 1 trade partner and buys most of its soybeans.
To prevent another outbreak, the government is promoting “integrated agriculture,” which involves monitoring pests, rotating crops and seed varieties, and using biological controls and natural enemies, with chemicals as a last resort.
It is a completely new approach, according to Rangel. “The helicoverpa changed everything about phytosanitary policy in Brazil,” he says.
“The solution for helicoverpa is to bring in products to control the helicoverpa — immediately,” says Bombarda, an agronomist from southern Brazil who was lured by the potential to work with irrigation in western Bahia’s frontier and employs full-time bug monitors on his farm.
The Bahia state government announced that Emamectin Benzoate, a substance manufactured by Swiss crop chemical maker Syngenta, would be available in March 2013, shortly after Embrapa identified the new caterpillar.
Yet a year later, farmers still do not have access to it.
“It turned into an unprecedented bureaucracy ... the government created a bunch of rules and obstacles,” says Celito Breda, a cotton consultant in Bahia who has traveled across Brazil to discuss helicoverpa armigera and believes Emamectin Benzoate would provide the most efficient control.
Syngenta says the company awaited decisions from federal and state governments on regulations and permits needed to import the product, which is sold all over the world, including the U.S. and parts of Latin America.
Rangel says bureaucratic hurdles had been worked out and Emamectin Benzoate would be available with special approval on an emergency basis. He defends the government’s caution, saying that as a top commodities exporter, Brazil must be careful about what pesticides are used to avoid retaliation from buyers.
President Dilma Rousseff’s government has authorized 36 other chemical and biological products to combat helicoverpa armigera, Rangel says.
Syngenta’s loss, Monsanto’s gain?
Two weeks from harvest, Bombarda’s soybean crop looks healthy. He applied pesticides 10 times, including five coats of Belt, a product he had never used before, made by Germany’s Bayer AG.
Syngenta has so far lost out on what would have been a lucrative opportunity to sell Emamectin Benzoate in Brazil. But Monsanto, the world’s largest seed company, had better luck.
In the past 11 years, Monsanto developed a caterpillar-resistant soybean strain specifically for South America, with an eye on Brazil’s growing pesticide reliance.
“Today there is basically 12 months of continuous planting, and you don’t break the pest cycle,” says Renato Carvalho, an insect control specialist at Monsanto in Sao Paulo. “Over the years pressure increases, the pests become resistant to the insecticides and increase in population.”
China approved imports of the new seed, Intacta RR2 Pro, in June, and it was first sold on the Brazilian market in July. The seeds accounted for some 4 percent of soybean area planted this season and are so far proving resistant to helicoverpa armigera.
The company is also selling Bollgard Cotton seeds, which have helped control helicoverpa armigera in Australia. Some 90 percent of soybeans planted are genetically modified in Brazil, where international companies, including Syngenta and Dow Agrosciences, also sell seeds.
More Intacta seeds will be available for next season, though not nearly enough to cover local demand, Monsanto says. Intacta seeds cost 115 reais per hectare, five times more than the 22 reais Brazilian farmers paid for the company’s previous technology, herbicide-resistant Roundup Ready.
Jose Schreiner, a vice president at the National Agriculture Federation, says Intacta was proving resistant to helicoverpa armigera in his state of Goiás, but he hopes GMO technology will be just one of many tools used to combat the caterpillar.
“I think working with biological control, natural enemies, is the road we should pursue,” Schreiner says, referring to viruses that can be applied to crops to kill caterpillars.
“We won’t be able to eliminate it, but we should be able to have a good level of control at a lower cost.”