Advertise in Print | Subscriptions
Published January 18, 2011, 10:28 AM

Vilsack reflects on 2010 in agriculture

ATLANTA — Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack broke from his prepared remarks to the American Farm Bureau Federation in Atlanta Jan. 10 to observe that he had come to the convention with “a heavy heart” after the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., and others on Jan. 8 in Arizona.

By: Jerry Hagstrom, Special to Agweek

ATLANTA — Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack broke from his prepared remarks to the American Farm Bureau Federation in Atlanta Jan. 10 to observe that he had come to the convention with “a heavy heart” after the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., and others on Jan. 8 in Arizona.

“We need to take a minute to appreciate what we have,” Vilsack said, adding that it was hard to give a speech under the circumstances.

Thanking producers

He said, however, he thought it fitting to thank Farm Bureau members for producing the nation’s food supply and to thank rural Americans for their contributions to American life, particularly because a disproportionate number of them serve in the military.

Vilsack noted he is not a stranger to political violence, recalling that in 1986, a disgruntled resident opened fire with a handgun during a city council meeting in his then hometown of Mount Pleasant, Iowa, killing the mayor and wounding two council members.

Though he did not mention it in the Farm Bureau speech, the mayor’s father and others encouraged him to run for the office.

Vilsack, who had moved to his wife’s hometown after finishing law school in the mid 1970s, was elected mayor in 1987 and went on to serve three terms before serving in the state Iowa Legislature and being elected governor of Iowa.

Out of respect for the victims in Arizona, Vilsack postponed an announcement on the funding of biorefineries, and first lady Michelle Obama postponed an announcement related to her “Let’s Move” anti-obesity campaign.

The past year

In his general remarks, Vilsack said American agriculture “had a pretty good year in 2010,” and noted that farm income is at a record level.

He attributed that income to productivity, innovation and exports.

Trade talks

He noted Agriculture Undersecretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services Jim Miller, who had been scheduled to speak at the Farm Bureau’s annual meeting, is in China in an attempt to reduce restrictions on U.S. beef exports.

Vilsack also said he had gone to Mexico recently to try to reduce barriers to U.S. beef and potatoes and said he hopes Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s proposal to address the issue of restrictions on Mexican trucks entering the United States will encourage Mexico to lift the increased tariffs it has put on American farm products in protest.

He also said he hopes Congress quickly will act on the free trade agreement with South Korea that the Obama administration has negotiated, noting the administration also is pushing multilateral agreements.

He cited the proposed TransPacific Partnership as an example of a potentially positive multilateral agreement, but did not mention the World Trade Organization Doha Round.

Smarter spending

Vilsack also said the government needs to spend less, but better spend its money on agriculture better, citing as an example his recent announcement of payments to farmers to encourage them to use the crop insurance program efficiently.

During the upcoming budget and farm bill debate, he said, “We do need to have a conversation about the safety net. We do need a safety net.”

He said he is expecting reports on possible changes to dairy policy in the next month.

Vilsack said, “our dairy farmers need” help, and noted the number of dairy farmers has declined from 110,000 to 65,000 in 10 years.

Modified crops

Vilsack also appealed to Farm Bureau members to seriously think about his plan for dealing with the conflict over genetically modified crops by using environmental impact statements to create a system of buffer zones and planting and harvesting rules for these crops.

All farmers — whether they grow genetically modified crops, identity preserved crops or organic crops — should be able to grow without fearing there will be interference from the courts in their planting decisions. Vilsack said.

“This is not an easy conversation,” Vilsack concluded, adding that it would be easier for him to ignore the issue.

Tags: